Home > Email Marketing > Lyris HQ Review: Email Service Provider

Lyris HQ Review: Email Service Provider

June 19th, 2008

Lyris HQLyris HQ is an online Marketing Resource Management (MRM) tool, but this review will focus primarily on their Email Service offering (Email Labs) that is bundled in Lyris HQ. Email Labs is a robust solution that combines all of the Email Marketing features you would want in a modern email Marketing solution such as personalizations, dynamic list segmentation, triggered events and more.

User Interface

Lyris HQ homepageLyris HQ uses the Adobe Flex platform which gives the UI a look and feel of a desktop application. The first thing I noticed when using the application is that it doesn’t feel like a tightly integrated system. Clicking any of the icon links, Email Advisor, Click Tracks, Hot Bananas, Bid Hero or Email Labs opens a pop up window where you manage that portion of the application.

The creation of an email campaign is very detailed with lots of “help” options and definitions to lead you through the steps. It has an auto generate text version from HTML which I love. It never is “perfect”, but it is much easier to edit the auto generated text then to create a text version from scratch. There were some additional options on the right side column I wanted to explore but on doing so, it opened an additional pop-up window (for those of youLyris HQ HTML view that are keeping score that is the third pop-up window!). The fourth step in the process was the “Notes and Tasks.” The “Tasks” section may allow you to change the URL for visible links, but there are not help options to explain (on further review it is a section for adding notes regarding the links). Once the email campaign has been created, the next step, testing, sending or scheduling the campaign isn’t easily discoverable. When I was making a corrections to the HTML, I noticed on the right side column a HTML checker and a SPAM checker that I completely missed on my first go around.

Lyris’s quick test is actually more robust then their Proof. It allows you to send multiple versions and simulate sending to random contacts in your list.

During the Proof Test, a version appeared incorrect in gMail, so I was able to make a quick correctioninbox snapshot

The inbox snap shot is one of the coolest features in their suite of offerings. It tests ISP email address and reports on whether the email made it to the indbox, was marked as SPAM, or was filtered to the “bulk” folder.

The Bad: The Lyris login homepage didn’t automatically update to reflect that a new list had been added, or a campaign had been scheduled or sent. One of the big advantages of Flex is that it is supposed to have the ability to asynchronously update content.

It took some time to import a list because they didn’t have steps in the creation of a new list. Creating the name of a list appears in the first set of options and adding “member records” is in the third set of options.

The text version of the test looked terrible because the urls had all been swapped out with urls that were not links to my website. If I received this email I would assume it was spam.

Deliverability

Lyris HQ has a dedicated deliverability team, authentication tools and has ongoing ISP scores. Part of my review was to send the same email campaign using each ESP that was in the round-up to determine what the baseline deliverability rates for each ESP.

Results of the Lyris HQ test email campaign:

  • Number of emails sent: 200
  • delivered: 194
  • Hard Bounces: 6
  • Soft Bounces: 0
  • Unique Opens: 18 (9% open rate)

A 9% open rate was the lowest of any of the ESP that were in our round-up.

Final Thoughts

I liked Lyris HQ but was disappointed in their User interface because it had scored so well in Jupiter reports. I have no doubt that their email component is really nice, but it was wrapped up in such a bad UI that it made for a bad user experience. I was also surprised that they had such poor API documentation. I suspect that Lyris is so busy trying to create an MRM suite through acquisitions and add-ons that they haven’t spent enough time documenting and making a well-integrated system.

website: http://www.lyris.com/

Share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Delivra Review : Email Service Provider
  2. Listrak Review: Email Service Provider
  3. StreamSend Review: Email Service Provider
  4. ExactTarget Review: Email Service Provider
  5. Part 1: Email Service Provider Round-UP

  1. August 16th, 2008 at 04:09 | #1

    Your blog is interesting!

    Keep up the good work!

  2. February 14th, 2009 at 14:09 | #2

    I couldn’t agree with you more. Great functionality, but absolutely the worst UI of any product of its kind that I’ve used. The workflow is also unbelieveably bad. For instance, to cancel an email campaign I had scheduled a few weeks ago for a distribution list, I had to know the *exact date* that I had originally created the campaign. Otherwise, I’m unable to even locate a screen where canceling the campaign is an option. I could name at least a dozen workflow issues like this. My impression is that Lyris is on a shopping spree buying companies so they have more neat tools. As a result, they have a bowl of spaghetti noodles that is impossible to navigate. And at $1,000 a month, its a steep price to pay for something that is so difficult to use.

  3. February 26th, 2009 at 13:23 | #3

    @Andrew

    I’m the Email Marketing Product Manager at Lyris and would love the opportunity to chat about your issues with our workflow and listen to any ideas that you may have to improve it. We’re continuing to make great progress in tightening up the application and improving work flow and your input is valuable as we continue this process.

    Please don’t hesitate to shoot me an email (lkloepping at lyris dot com).

    Thanks!

  4. R.S.
    May 13th, 2009 at 08:48 | #4

    Ditto on the functionality issue. The funny part is that the older version (even though it was just as ineffecient and annoying to work with) was better than the new one. Did the EL Product Managers or Developers even care to look at the following features in the New Version of EL:

    1) Inserting Symbols
    2) FONT Color (this should have been there at the minimum)
    3) Underline capability (this should have been there at the minimum)
    4) the ablity to send to more than ONE SEGMENT instead of having to copy the email and then send again to another segment

    These issues are just the minimum. Lets not talk about how I have to click on a silly text box about 8 times before I can even begin to type anything in my email. I also absolutely love how the subject line NEVER SAVES. Also, I love it when you make a copy of an email and everything seems to copy, except the subject line.

    You should know that when creating an HTML email – and you choose to copy the HTML content for the text version – EL doesnt like any commas, quotes, and the spacing is always off.

    I dont know why this product was even launched in the first place. I would go back to Constanct Contact in a heartback. It was FAST, effecient, user friendly and layout was clean.

    Its absolutely absurd that this product even made it out to businesses.
    I wonder if there was any QA done – did the project manager even think to test product?

  5. Ryan
    November 13th, 2009 at 14:16 | #5

    Our company has been using Lyris HQ for over a year now, and it has been the worst experience I have ever had with an HTML Email Deployment system. Bad interface, glitchy registrant CSV exports, dropped information when users signed up, undeletable form demographics, lag time, high pricing… should I go on?

    Considering the plethora of HTML Email Deployment systems out there, Lyris HQ really has to step up their game. I only wish I was around when our company made the decision to go with them.

    Do yourself a favor and skip Lyris HQ.

  6. PG
    December 11th, 2009 at 08:55 | #6

    Every review here is spot-on. I cannot get the new LyrisHQ interface to do anything I need it to. Basic functions available on EmailLabs are forgotten or deemed unimportant by their team of “experts.” As we are being phased out of EmailLabs, support for the old interface is disappearing, as is it’s functionality. So far, we can’t even copy a message to another list! Switching soon…any suggestions?

  7. December 11th, 2009 at 11:08 | #7

    PG,
    How many emails does your company send per month? That makes all the difference in which Email Service Providers I would recommend.

    -Lary

  8. March 9th, 2010 at 12:42 | #8

    I’m curious whether anyone has used Lyris HQ for Salesforce? We’re a smaller business and looking to try out an email marketing service that works well in conjunction with Salesforce. We only send emails to approx 1200 or so clients, so we’re in the search for a program that’s affordable and efficient.

  9. kkm760
    July 5th, 2010 at 16:30 | #9

    Why is the app blocking access to view certain websites? I didn ot install this and would like to get rid of it. How do I go about it? Let me know. Thanks,

  1. November 29th, 2008 at 00:25 | #1
Abbott and Costello Go to Mars movie White Christmas download movie Fuck download movie Young Sherlock Holmes download movie Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement download movie Nancy Drew download movie White Christmas download movie Fuck download movie Young Sherlock Holmes download movie Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement download movie Nancy Drew download movie canadian pharmacy tramadol